| QZanden added subscribers: Nemo_bis, QZanden. QZanden added a comment. |
In T102417#3158438, @Mike_Peel wrote:In T102417#3098196, @Nemo_bis wrote:Having a separate box for Commons would make it a lot clearer that commons links can be added in the same way that other sister sites can be.
Showing a difference helps conveying that there is no difference? Quite an oxymoron.
Showing the same box for Commons as is shown for the other sister sites (e.g., Wikipedia) shows that there is no difference in adding the links. Having it different by including it under 'other sites' is what is different. I have not seen any other project linked to under 'other sites', definitely not one so widely used as Wikimedia Commons.
Agree with @Nemo_bis
If you say we should have a separate box for commons, we should also have a separate box for wikidata, mediawiki, species and meta. But because all of these sites are on one domain and not using xx.wikiproject.org, they are bundled under one section.
I agree the header could be more unambigious, maybe something like 'monolingual wmf-sites''?
Cc: QZanden, Nemo_bis, Nikki, Romaine, Ricordisamoa, Mike_Peel, daniel, Steinsplitter, Aklapper, Reguyla, GoranSMilovanovic, Izno, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
