| Smalyshev added a comment. |
I think this is not the last time we're hearing about such setup. With more and more data being processed and us starting to use algorithms and tools that require significant computing power (ML, graph DBs, etc.) we'd have more use cases that need storage beyond 160G and larger processing power, while not being fully production setups.
I do not insist on any particular solution for this one, but I think we need to start thinking about how we can run real-hardware non-production setups, or cover such requirements in some other way.
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: Smalyshev
Cc: daniel, Lydia_Pintscher, bd808, chasemp, Gehel, Aklapper, Smalyshev, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, Avner, debt, Jonas, FloNight, Xmlizer, Izno, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Tobias1984, Manybubbles, Mbch331
Cc: daniel, Lydia_Pintscher, bd808, chasemp, Gehel, Aklapper, Smalyshev, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, Avner, debt, Jonas, FloNight, Xmlizer, Izno, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Tobias1984, Manybubbles, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
