| Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE added a comment. |
One possibility would be to add a new status, “mandatory violation” (or “severe violation”?).
I think I like this approach, even though I’m a bit suspicious of its simplicity. If a mandatory constraint has a violation, bump the status to “severe violation” and add “constraint_status: mandatory” to the output parameters.
On the special page, “severe violation” would look like “bad parameters” (darker shade of red than “violation”).
In the gadget, perhaps we could reuse the headings approach from T169971: Make “bad parameters” results less prominent in the gadget: “potential issues” would no longer be the heading of the entire popup, but only of the normal “violation” section; “severe violation” (or “mandatory violation” or something else) would be a separate section (above the “potential issues”), with a small explanatory text that these violations are worse than others.
Cc: Jan_Dittrich, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Aklapper, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, Izno, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
