| daniel added a comment. |
In T172192#3493920, @Aleksey_WMDE wrote:... That's actually part of the data model specification.
As I understood it is not set in stone, or is it?
It was discussed over and over, and has become part of a spec. Nothing is using the spec yet, but we'd have to have a very good reason to open that discussion again. I currently see no reason for that.
Note that there technically is no need for FormId or SenseId to know about the LexemeId class, or about the syntax of Lexeme IDs. If we don't need the code to be restrictive about this, it can just know that there is a parent Entity ID. It doesn't need to care about the type of syntax of that parent entity ID.
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: daniel
Cc: Jakob_WMDE, Lydia_Pintscher, thiemowmde, Jonas, WMDE-leszek, Aklapper, daniel, Aleksey_WMDE, PokestarFan, Cinemantique, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, Izno, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Darkdadaah, Mbch331
Cc: Jakob_WMDE, Lydia_Pintscher, thiemowmde, Jonas, WMDE-leszek, Aklapper, daniel, Aleksey_WMDE, PokestarFan, Cinemantique, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, Izno, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Darkdadaah, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
