| EBernhardson added a comment. |
One worry i have is about over-creating fields. If we are talking about 5 relationships then maybe it's no big deal, but if we want to capture many different relationships, both in wikidata and eventually in structured data, i wonder if we could rather have some sort of relationship (name tbd) keyword field that encodes both parts. Perhaps we could encode the direct properties of an entity with a full description, say Q229331 (Muse) could have a relationships array populated with:
P31:Q4167410 P1889:Q16877643
Then filters for disambigation pages would put a query on relationship: P31:Q4167410. This of course cannot possibly encode all the possible relationships, especially qualifiers, but it seems a plausible step to more generalized direct-relationship (non-graph) filtering?
Cc: EBernhardson, dcausse, daniel, Aklapper, Smalyshev, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, EBjune, Izno, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
