| Hjfocs added a comment. |
@Pintoch I think that Wikidata RDF for data imports should be as concise as possible to facilitate data providers. I'm trying to reduce the RDF verbosity to a maximum, avoiding reified nodes where possible.
Of course, QuickStatements is much more compact, but totally non-standard, which is likely to mean no parsers, serializers, validators, etc. This was the main "community" rationale for choosing RDF.
Technically speaking, RDF also enables fine-grained filtering of suggested statements via SPARQL queries, which are very useful to improve things like this: M218/691.
Talking about specs, I've come up with what I think should be the relevant Wikidata RDF subset for data providers. I'm working with the WikiFactMine (ping @tarro) guys probably test it with folks
Cc: Pintoch, Aklapper, Hjfocs, Tpt, Lydia_Pintscher, Smalyshev, GoranSMilovanovic, Kiailandi, QZanden, dachary, Izno, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Ricordisamoa, Sjoerddebruin, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
