daniel added a comment.

In any case, this would consume front-edge client connections, but wouldn't trigger anything deeper into the stack

That's assuming varnish always caches the entire request, and never "streams" to the backend, even for file uploads. When discussing this with @hoo he told me that this should be the case - but is it? That would make it easy to exhaust RAM on the varnish boxes, no?

this is definitely on the receiving end of responses from the applayer.

So a slow-request-log would help?


TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T179156

EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: daniel
Cc: daniel, Peachey88, ema, Gehel, Smalyshev, TerraCodes, Jay8g, Liuxinyu970226, Paladox, Zppix, Stashbot, gerritbot, thiemowmde, aude, Marostegui, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Legoktm, tstarling, awight, Ladsgroup, Lydia_Pintscher, ori, BBlack, demon, greg, Aklapper, hoo, Lahi, Lordiis, GoranSMilovanovic, Adik2382, Th3d3v1ls, Hfbn0, Ramalepe, Liugev6, QZanden, Lewizho99, Maathavan, Mkdw, Liudvikas, srodlund, Luke081515, Wikidata-bugs, ArielGlenn, faidon, zeljkofilipin, Alchimista, He7d3r, Mbch331, Rxy, fgiunchedi, mmodell
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to