| Hanna_Petruschat_WMDE added a comment. |
Thanks for the further insights. From a non-coder perspective I interpreted the word "term" differently. But as a string it makes sense.
I like the "Labels and Descriptions" as it says, what the box actually has to offer and also picks up on words already been shown. I know this is not a super important issue rn but in terms of transparency (which includes understandibility in my opinion), I would like to use wording which is clear to a lot of/most people. We are going to reach out to users in the next days to get their opinion on the current state of the "Labels and Descriptions". Let's see if we can gather insights on the naming topic as well.
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: Hanna_Petruschat_WMDE
Cc: thiemowmde, Lydia_Pintscher, Charlie_WMDE, Jan_Dittrich, Hanna_Petruschat_WMDE, Aklapper, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, JGirault, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
Cc: thiemowmde, Lydia_Pintscher, Charlie_WMDE, Jan_Dittrich, Hanna_Petruschat_WMDE, Aklapper, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, JGirault, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
