C933103 added a comment. |
In T137810#3811581, @Liuxinyu970226 wrote:In T137810#3771454, @C933103 wrote:What is the rationale of macrolanguage being not usable to identify text?
If you could make a language conversion system between two writting system, Okay, otherwise my aganist to mn-Mong is still valid.
Inner Mongolian University has developed a sentence-based conversion engine (As in the engine require context from other words in the sentence to determine which candidate word should be used for transliteration) and it was claimed in another essay which I linked on somewhere else that the engine has up to 85% correct rate (Although 85% correct rate still mean about one error per every six words on average). The conversion engine was linked from the English WIkipedia's article for Mongolian Script's external link section.
Cc: ChristianKl, C933103, jhsoby, thiemowmde, Liuxinyu970226, Lydia_Pintscher, GerardM, Aklapper, Zppix, Popolon, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs