On 11/03/13 14:52, Denny Vrandečić wrote:
Personally, I regard Wiktionary as the third priority, following Wikipedia and Commons. A lot of the other projects -- like Wikivoyage or Wikisource -- can be served with only small changes to Wikidata as it is, but both Commons and Wiktionary would require a bit of thought (and here again, Commons much less than Wiktionary). I would appreciate a
On the other hand, I believe Wiktionary too could be well helped with only small changes to Wikidata. Interwiki links are the same problem as on Wikipedia and could be solved in the same way. Things like words' plural, inflections etc. are very tedious to write and could be solved like Wikipedia infoboxes. It is relations between words and concepts that are the difficult problem and that might require larger Wikidata modifications, so this part could be left for the future.
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
