Actually you got to have an item to make use of wikidata properties. I
think we are making too much of a deal to get or not to get an item in
Wikidata. An item just identify something, whether or not this something is
important to knowledge or not.


2013/6/20 Jane Darnell <jane...@gmail.com>

> I don't see each file on Commons having its own WikiData item, but I
> do think each subject of files should have their own item (and some,
> but not all of them, may also have their own wikipedia pages). These
> files on Commons could make use of properties on wikidata like "is
> designed by", "is a copy of", "is an example of", "is the best image
> of" or something like that. When the work is a sculpture or a garden
> and there are many photos, it would be nice to promote one of them to
> "best choice image" for some works, this way you can easily replace
> photos across many Wikipedia's for some of the great pictures coming
> in with efforts like "Wiki Loves Monuments".
>
> Similarly, I don't think each poem or each book should have its own
> WikiData item, but I think each first edition should have its own
> item, and all other editions should be able to link to it, regardless
> of translated versions and so on. I see WikiSource and WikiBooks as
> the same in this respect.
>
> 2013/6/20, Martynas Jusevičius <marty...@graphity.org>:
> > You probably mean Linked Data?
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:41 PM, David Cuenca <dacu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> While on the Hackathon I had the opportunity to talk with some people
> from
> >> sister projects about how they view Wikidata and the relationship it
> >> should
> >> have to sister projects. Probably you are already familiar with the
> views
> >> because they have been presented already several times. The hopes are
> >> high,
> >> in my opinion too high, about what can be accomplished when Wikidata is
> >> deployed to sister projects.
> >>
> >> There are conflicting needs about what belongs into Wikidata and what
> >> sister
> >> projects need, and that divide it is far greater to be overcome than
> just
> >> by
> >> installing the extension. In fact, I think there is a confusion between
> >> the
> >> need for Wikidata and the need for structured data. True that Wikidata
> >> embodies that technology, but I don't think all problems can be
> approached
> >> by the same centralized tool. At least not from the social side of it.
> >> Wikiquote could have one item for each quote, or Wikivoyage an item for
> >> each
> >> bar, hostel, restaurant, etc..., and the question will always be: are
> they
> >> relevant enough to be created in Wikidata? Considering that Wikidata was
> >> initially thought for Wikipedia, that scope wouldn't allow those uses.
> >> However, the structured data needs could be covered in other ways.
> >>
> >> It doesn't need to be a big wikidata addressing it all. It could well
> be a
> >> central Wikidata addressing common issues (like author data, population
> >> data, etc), plus other Wikidata installs on each sister project that
> >> requires it. For instance there could be a data.wikiquote.org, a
> >> data.wikivoyage.org, etc that would cater for the needs of each
> community,
> >> that I predict will increase as soon as the benefits become clear, and
> of
> >> course linked to the central Wikidata whenever needed. Even Commons
> could
> >> be
> >> "wikidatized" with each file becoming an item and having different
> labels
> >> representing the file name depending on the language version being
> >> accessed.
> >>
> >> Could be this the right direction to go?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Micru
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Wikidata-l mailing list
> >> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikidata-l mailing list
> > Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata-l mailing list
> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

Reply via email to