So what if we do it twice? That's not the end of the world, and as far
as
I understand it, it's not like an effort that would be wasted on a task
while abondonning the other. Just because you clean the dust today
doesn't
mean you are sabotaging your big spring cleanning plan.
Le 2013-09-09 18:54, Luca Martinelli a écrit :
2013/9/9 Darkdadaah <darkdad...@yahoo.fr>:
Hi,
The proposal is about Wiktionary articles/pages language "interwiki"
links
(e.g. [[en:coin]], [[fr:coin]]), not about individual
words/homographs/lexemes (e.g. coin-en-noun, coin-en-verb,
coin-fr-noun)
which is still discussed elsewhere (see the latest here
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Comparison_of_Projects_and_Proposals_for_Wiktionary).
We do need those links, independently of the other data for the
words
themselves.
Darkdd
Yes, but if the proposal is accepted, we will have to do the work
twice. As I wrote to you on WD, there is no rush.
--
Association Culture-Libre
http://www.culture-libre.org/
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
