In technical terms a machine which is using forward and backward propagation to make a approximate prediction [1] is being called a neural network and doesn't matter if I agree or not.
BTW: I use BGFS not gradient descending. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_neural_network On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Markus Krötzsch < mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org> wrote: > On 07.03.2015 18:21, Magnus Manske wrote: > >> Congratulations for this bold step towards the Singularity :-) >> > > Lol. The word "neural" in the name of the algorithm is infinitely more > attractive and inspiring than something abstract like "Support Vector > Machine", isn't it? -- although we know that both approaches are much more > similar to each other than to any biological neural system. ;-) However, > since this is a general mailing list, it may be fair to clarify that this > is just a gradient-descent based optimization procedure that we are > deadling with here, and that it has nothing to do with a "thinking" general > AI. I know that you know this, but not all of our readers may ... > > Cheers, > > Markus > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata-l mailing list > Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l > -- Amir
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
