I mean, the lexical data in Wikidata according to the proposal would allow for statements on Lexemes and Forms. I slipped into the future for a moment ;)
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:32 PM Denny Vrandečić <vrande...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am not sure I understand what you are saying. The lexical data in > Wikidata does allow for statements on Lexemes and Forms, as the proposal > states explicitly. > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:25 PM Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hoi, >> Given the opposition to having statements on the level of the label, it >> does not make sense to have Wiktionary included in Wikidata. >> Thanks, >> GerardM >> >> On 8 May 2015 at 06:19, Denny Vrandečić <vrande...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I would disagree with requiring the Wiktionary communities to change >>> their ways. Instead we should adapt our plans to fit into the way they are >>> set up. >>> >>> Even if the English Wiktionary community would change to have >>> per-language pages instead of the current system, it would be rather >>> unlikely that all other language editions of Wiktionary would follow in a >>> timely manner. I would prefer to leave this decision to the autonomy of the >>> projects, and instead adapt to them (which is, by the way, what the >>> proposal does). >>> >>> Yair, as Daniel said, the current Wiktionary pages would not be mapped >>> to Q-Items. Since this was unclear, I tried to update the text to make it >>> clearer. Let me know if it is still confusing. >>> >>> I do not think a separate Wikibase instance would be needed to provide >>> the data for Wiktionary. I think this can and should be done on Wikidata. >>> But as said by Milos and pointed out by Gerard, lexical knowledge does >>> indeed require a different data schema. This is why the proposal introduces >>> new entity types for lexemes, forms, and senses. The data model is mostly >>> based on lexical ontologies that we surveyed, like LEMON and others. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:26 PM Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemow...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Andy Mabbett, 07/05/2015 22:53: >>>> >> >The Wiktionary communities tend to strongly disagree that splitting >>>> entries >>>> >> >per language would be easier for either editors or readers. >>>> > How many languages are currently used? How will this scale to ~300 >>>> languages? >>>> >>>> Hm? Last time I counted, the English Wiktionary alone used way more than >>>> 300 languages. >>>> >>>> Nemo >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Wikidata-l mailing list >>>> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikidata-l mailing list >>> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata-l mailing list >> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >> >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l