Wikivoyage is probably the easiest to start with because of things such as
similarity to Wikipedia.
Hazard-SJ
________________________________
From: Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemow...@gmail.com>
To: Discussion list for the Wikidata project. <wikidat...@lists.wikimedia.org>
Cc: Wikidata technical discussion <wikidata-tech@lists.wikimedia.org>; Ken
Snider <ksni...@wikimedia.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Wikidata-tech] [Wikidata-l] WikiVOYAGE deployment plan
legoktm, 28/06/2013 23:45:
> Hi Denny,
> I'm really excited to see a sister project getting included,
+1
I've no idea why start with Wikivoyage, but it's very good that the
central interwiki management is being extended to other projects when
it's easy to do so (as it would be for Wikiquote and, mutatis mutandis,
Commons).
Nemo
> however I'm
> concerned that the community needs a bit more time and notice (I didn't
> see anything about this on WD:PC). When importing interwiki links for
> Wikipedias, we had a few months before they were used on client sites.
> The proposed schedule gives our bots ~3 days to import a majority of
> links, which I don't think is enough time. A whole week would be much
> better in my opinion.
> I've also started a page on-wiki to help coordinate the migration:
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Wikivoyage_migration
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-tech mailing list
Wikidata-tech@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-tech
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-tech mailing list
Wikidata-tech@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-tech
