But also Wikidata brings lots of mistakes/issues up.

Vito

2015-09-27 23:12 GMT+02:00 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>:

> Hoi,
> In them old days, this would be called a typical case of gigo or garbage
> in garbage out. It is hardly the only instance where what we define in
> Wikidata is not what we find in one of our sources.
>
> It is to be expected, it is not something to get upset about.
>
> At this time I am working on a division of the Netherlands that is largely
> wrong in Wikipedia. That is at most worthy of a blog post, telling people
> about it, making a list that makes this division understandable for use on
> any Wikipedia that wants it.
>
> It is good to appreciate how erroneous Wikidata can be. It is good to
> appreciate that this happens with the best of intentions. The problem is
> not that there are errors, the problem is that we are lacking in well
> crafted workflows,build to help people fix what is wrong and report on it.
> We do not zoom in on known issues and therefore every item, every statement
> without a source is an issue. Even worse, many sourced statements are
> questionable but we have no way of classifying sources. Everything is a
> potential problem and we do not contain errors and have people work on what
> we know may be wrong.
>
> That is an issue worth talking about.. The rest is just a drop in the
> ocean.
> Thanks,
>        GerardM
>
> On 27 September 2015 at 20:06, Thad Guidry <thadgui...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> ​I live there sometimes. :)
>>
>> Partner City (an alias of that Sister City description) does even help
>> make them closer to any sister city.
>>
>> If anyone disagrees with me, then you would have to fully describe what
>> the property Sister City really means...because there is little to go on
>> other than the idea of a "twin city". ​
>>
>> Thad
>> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Vi to <vituzzu.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> From a technical point of view there's nothing wrong with those
>>> statemets.
>>>
>>> Original infos were added by
>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/ILoveKorea which
>>> doesn't seem to be a vandal. How did you find they are wrong?
>>>
>>>
>>> Vito
>>>
>>> 2015-09-27 18:57 GMT+02:00 Amir Ladsgroup <ladsgr...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Italian Wikipedia says it's correct:
>>>> https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hefei
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 8:21 PM Thad Guidry <thadgui...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> OK, it seems that Wikipedia does have a few nice features. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> I was able to quickly search History on the entity and find that
>>>>> Dexbot had imported the erroneous statements
>>>>> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Dexbot  <-- pretty cool options
>>>>> there, Good Job whomever !
>>>>>
>>>>> and let the User (owner of the bot) know of the problem.
>>>>> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User_talk:Ladsgroup
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thad
>>>>> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Thad Guidry <thadgui...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I had to clean up this entity that had Sister City property filled in
>>>>>> with lots of erroneous statements for it that I removed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q185684
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How can I figure out where the import went wrong, how it happened,
>>>>>> and how to ensure it doesn't happen again ?  How does one look at 
>>>>>> Wikidata
>>>>>> bots and their efficiency or incorrectness ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Trying to learn more,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thad
>>>>>> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Wikidata mailing list
>>>>> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wikidata mailing list
>>>> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikidata mailing list
>>> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikidata mailing list
>> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

Reply via email to