On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Magnus Manske <magnusman...@googlemail.com > wrote:
> Depends on your definition of "real". Wikidata Special Page stats count > all non-empty (as in "have statements", AFAIK) items, my stats > (wikidata-todo) count all items. Pick your truth. > Thanks, that's very helpful. And labels and descriptions don't count as statements, right? So, the 3M delta represents items with a label, and perhaps a description, but no other information. Are Wikipedia links also in the "not a statement" category? Tom > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 5:16 PM Tom Morris <tfmor...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> What is the canonical, authoritative source to find statistics about >> Wikidata? >> >> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Markus Krötzsch < >> mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> Is it possible that you have actually used the flawed statistics from >>> the Wikidata main page regarding the size of the project? 14.5M items in >>> Aug 2015 seems far too low a number. Our RDF exports from mid August >>> already contained more than 18.4M items. It would be nice to get this fixed >>> at some point. There are currently almost 20M items, and the main page >>> still shows only 16.5M. >> >> >> I see the following counts: >> >> 16.5M (current?) - https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Statistics >> 19.2M (December 2015) - https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/stats.php >> >> Where do I look for the real number? >> >> Tom >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata mailing list >> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
