Hi! > Relaying a question from a brief discussion on Twitter [1], I am curious > to hear how people feel about the idea of creating a a "SPARQL query > example" property for properties, modeled after "Wikidata property > example" [2]?
Might be nice, but we need a good way to present the query in the UI (see below). > This would allow people to discover queries that exemplify how the > property is used in practice. Does the approach make sense or would it > stretch too much the scope of properties of properties? Are there better > ways to reference SPARQL examples and bring them closer to their source? I think it may be a good idea to start thinking about some way of storing queries on Wikidata maybe? On one hand, they are just strings, on the other hand, they are code - like CSS or Javascript - and storing them just as strings may be inconvenient. Maybe .sparql file extension handler like we have for .js and .json and so on? -- Stas Malyshev smalys...@wikimedia.org _______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata