Hoi,
What do you mean by an "invitation" ? I do not see how that applies.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 6 January 2018 at 18:03, LeadSongDog <leads...@webname.com> wrote:
> Erika,
> Well, any authority record for each event could capture location, date,
> and links to the invitation and any generated products externally to wiki
> worlds. Would that not be constructive in the context of establishing
> wikidatan notability?
>
>
> On Jan 6, 2018, at 10:42 AM, Brill Lyle <wp.brilll...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi LeadSongDog,
>
> Yes that is an article that is part of the press list that the Black Lunch
> Table has generated
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/Black_Lunch_Table/Press
>
> Again, not a huge fan of using refs to justify an outreach initiative.
> Plus would it be necessary to use this ref to justify including Wikidata
> entries as BLT? I guess I am confused as to the need to reference things,
> where to reference things, and how that would work exactly. References to
> establish notability on Wikidata seems like a nightmarish requirement with
> the current interface. I would much prefer to use established identifiers
> via VIAF and other sources to establish notability.... It builds notability
> on top of established library science canons, and provides disambiguation,
> etc. Sorry I'm obsessed with this stuff, so I digress....
>
> I am not sure an authority control item -- I understand this conceptually
> but what form does it take in practical terms? -- will provide a solution
> to the problem these various outreach efforts are requiring.
>
> An authority control item for each editathon might be a large set of
> "dirty data" on Wikidata, wouldn't it? I think the idea was to use
> something lightweight, already existing, and efficient to provide a SPARQL
> query/Listeria task list -- and not impinge on existing metadata
> significantly.
>
> Having a Wikimedia project-centered maintenance (for lack of a better
> word) property might be a solution, too. But I think this is the issue that
> came up in the main discussion and why catalog was suggested by consensus,
> because a maintenance project for the WikiWorld would be a somewhat big
> step organizationally to implement, I think? Apologies, I defer to Gerard's
> expertise and knowledge-base on this.
>
> Best,
>
> - Erika
>
> *Erika Herzog*
> Wikipedia *User:BrillLyle <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BrillLyle>*
>
> On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 4:45 AM, LeadSongDog <leads...@webname.com> wrote:
>
>> Erika,
>> You might consider using https://www.artsy.net/article/
>> the-art-genome-project-why-are-all-the-black-artists-sitting
>> -together-in-the-cafeteria as a ref. There must be something usable
>> there.
>>
>> From what I've seen it seems that BLT is principally a series of informal
>> meetings, only some of which pertain to the editathons. Each meeting has
>> distinct constituency and subject. As such, each could in principle get its
>> own authority control, as for a convention. The individual artists
>> attending may often already be so described, but as they may edit
>> pseudonymously one must be careful to avoid outing.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
