Hi! > This is a bit tangential to the topic, but isn’t that basically what > schema.org was developed for? (I’m not sure if that’s still its primary > purpose, but as far as I know it was started by a group of search > engines to develop a unified format websites could use to make their > semantics more accessible to those search engines.)
There are a number of schemas, like Dublin Core, that try to address issues like that. However, none is even close to what we're talking about - covering several thousands properties that change all the time. They have very basic things covered, but AFAIK not much beyond. And I think those vocabularies still do not solve our problem with updating labels in multiple languages and keeping them in sync. That said, this would be quite offtopic for *this* thread, but still if anybody has any ideas on how to present Wikidata content better to search engines using well-known metadata vocabularies, I think it would be a very welcome effort. -- Stas Malyshev smalys...@wikimedia.org _______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
