Hoi, I add bucket loads of new awards, awardees and add them to humans. What I have found in the past is that controversial points were adopted that are inherently problematic. Given that I likely add more awards than most, the value of such a consensus is questionable. I find that I lost interest and totally ignore their point of view. Thanks
On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 at 13:41, Thomas Douillard <thomas.douill...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, I participated into the edits that ended up with this mess, so I plead > guilty /o\. > > I’d say the problem is that we don’t really have a model at all. At best, > there is some WikiProject that try to impose some rules they decided, with > the notion of concensus decided by the people of the project. Some > WikiProjects exists for some domains but are inactive and/or inefficient to > impose rules. Apart from that there is constraints, that are decided by the > sums of individual edits, for example, and occasionally discussions on > project chat or other venue like the french «bistro». In my experience RfCs > on the model does not usually reach a conclusion. In this case there is a > WikiProject Award, that sets up some rule : https://www.wikidata.org , > but … I’m not sure how those rules came up and the rationale behind it are > not explained. > > Le sam. 28 sept. 2019 à 13:00, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> a > écrit : > >> On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 20:34, Aidan Hogan <aid...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> > In summary, of the six types of Nobel prizes, three different properties >> > are used in five different combinations >> >> > I am more interested in the general problem of the >> > lack of consensus that such a case exhibits. >> >> Has there been any attempt to resolve this through discussion on-wiki? >> Failure to agree a consensus is a much more serious issue than a "we >> have yet to attempt to reach consensus" scenario. >> >> Have you attempted to make edits to align the items concerned, only to >> find them reverted? An active dispute (edit war) over how to model >> data is a much more serious issue than a "we have yet to attempt to >> reach consensus" scenario. >> >> In either case, links or preferably diffs would help. >> >> > What processes (be they social, technical, or some combination thereof) >> > are currently in place to reach consensus in these cases in Wikidata? >> >> On-wiki discussion, usually on a project page, sometimes on project chat. >> >> -- >> Andy Mabbett >> @pigsonthewing >> http://pigsonthewing.org.uk >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata mailing list >> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >> > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
