Dear Leigh,

Let us start with the items as listed by you plus, collaboration requests
for new project and some crucial tips on using WE, opinion of famous
academicians/administrators about WE etc.

-- 
Warm regards

Anil
http://wikieducator.org/User:Anil_Prasad
http://wikieducator.org/India
http://wikieducator.org/Qualification_Framework
http://wikieducator.org/Qualification_Framework/Professional_Education/Management/MHRM

Skype: apletters

On 12/9/08, Leigh Blackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What do we have happening Monthly already?
>
> We have featured user pages
> We have Anil summerising significant discussions
> We have featured OER
> We have reports from L4C workshops
> We could have reports from other courses
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:54 AM, Randy Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Anil,
>>
>> Great work!
>>
>> A suggestion... I recall mentioning this idea to Leigh awhile back....
>>
>> Maybe we could source some journalism types (i.e., students, or up and
>> coming folks) to develop content for such a newsletter.... It would be a
>> great experience for them, as well as building up a profile....tasks could
>> be news and events, profiles of wiki personalities, and projects, and
>> feature stories.
>>
>> - Randy
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 5:31 AM, Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> As Dr. Wayne has suggested I have added my suggestions on Phase 3 at
>>> the talk page.
>>> http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator_talk:WikiEducator_3.0
>>>
>>> Let us give high priority to Monthly News letter because it will help
>>> as in project co-ordination to a greater extent. We may forward the
>>> news letter to other stake holders also. For that a separate mailing
>>> list may be maintained.
>>>
>>> We may start a new page to coordinate the inception activities.
>>> http:www.wikieducator.org/Wikieducator:NewsLetter is it ok?  I would
>>> also like to propose to start a separate technical discussion for News
>>> Letter.
>>>
>>> Warm regards
>>> Anil
>>>
>>> On Dec 8, 8:49 am, Wayne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > Hi Anil,
>>> >
>>> > These are very important suggestions for our future strategic planning
>>> > --- Please add these suggestions to our strategic planning page here:
>>> >
>>> > http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:WikiEducator_3.0
>>> >
>>> > You're right there is a growing need for additional tutorials on
>>> helping
>>> > newbies with questions like where to start a new page --- we've made a
>>> > humble start here:
>>> >
>>> > http://www.wikieducator.org/Wikieducator_tutorial/Developing_a_teachi.
>>> ..
>>> >
>>> > but still lots of room for improvement and additional resources we can
>>> > develop to help newbies in becoming part of our community.
>>> >
>>> > We definitely need to improve our structure and categorisation of
>>> > content in the wiki. We've made a start with the content info box
>>> > template -- but this is still prototype and we need to test its
>>> > functionality. Once we've tested and refined this template, we'll need
>>> > to develop supporting tutorials on its use. See, for instance:
>>> >
>>> > http://www.wikieducator.org/Wikieducator_tutorial/Developing_a_teachi.
>>> ..
>>> >
>>> > We're hoping to include improved content listings using portal pages
>>> for
>>> > the School sector, Higher Education, TVET and professional development,
>>> > see for example:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://www.wikieducator.org/Portal:Primaryhttp://www.wikieducator.org/Portal:Secondaryhttp://www.wikieducator.org/Portal:Higher_Education..
>>> etc.
>>> >
>>> > However -- we still need to implement this properly.
>>> >
>>> > I really like the idea of a monthly newsletter -- and it would be great
>>> > if we could identify a group of volunteers to assist with compiling a
>>> > community newsletter.
>>> >
>>> > A while back we introduced a page starting to plot different roles in
>>> > the community -- perhaps we need to revisit and improve this concept.
>>> > All ideas welcome:
>>> >
>>> > http://www.wikieducator.org/Wikieducator_Roles
>>> >
>>> > Thanks Anil -- great suggestions. Lets get them implemented.
>>> >
>>> > Cheers
>>> > Wayne
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 08:57 +0530, aprasad wrote:
>>> > > Dear Dr. Wayne, Randy and other friends,
>>> >
>>> > > Connecting to an earlier thread about the urgent requirement of
>>> > > teacher education in ZA, we have to offer support officially. Before
>>> > > that we require some urgent and very basic preparations. For example,
>>> > > WE has now a very good repository of learning content…but as pointed
>>> > > out by many earlier, collaboration happens seldom. In our L4C
>>> > > Workshops we have to give greater emphasis on the best wiki practice
>>> > > on 'where to start a new page?' Now it is time to take this vital
>>> > > structural issue seriously. We have to take special care to avoid the
>>> > > situation wherein valuable content lay scattered, and we move towards
>>> > > creating another wikipedia, rather than learning content supportive
>>> to
>>> > > QFs and Curricula. A monthly e-News letter to introduce major events,
>>> > > new projects and higlighting the progress in existing projects may be
>>> > > started to facilitate collaboration.
>>> >
>>> > > Another thing we should do is to keep panels of WEs with specific
>>> > > experience and aptitude that can help us in the event of WE taking up
>>> > > projects officially. There should be a system to enlist names and
>>> > > other details voluntarily by members and a verification process to
>>> > > ensure the reliability. Online Volunteering project of UN
>>> > >http://www.onlinevolunteering.org/en/index.htmland Professional
>>> > > Educational Organization Internationalhttp://www.peoi.org/are doing
>>> > > the same successfully for years.
>>> >
>>> > > These aspects may be examined for incorporating in Phase 3 of WE that
>>> > > is being developed.
>>> >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Warm regards
>>> >
>>> > > Anil
>>> > >http://wikieducator.org/User:Anil_Prasad
>>> > >http://wikieducator.org/India
>>> > >http://wikieducator.org/Qualification_Framework
>>> > >
>>> http://wikieducator.org/Qualification_Framework/Professional_Educatio...
>>> >
>>> > > Skype: apletters
>>> >
>>> > > On 12/8/08, Wayne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >         Hi Randy,
>>> >
>>> > >         Good thinking Randy --- there are many strategic elements in
>>> > >         your post, which I think we need to incorporate into our
>>> > >         evolving strategy for the future:
>>> >
>>> > >        http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:WikiEducator_3.0
>>> >
>>> > >         Thinking about Professional Development, clearly this is an
>>> > >         important node for development. Thinking about the value
>>> > >         proposition, there are two important reasons why an OER
>>> > >         approach to professional development makes so much sense:
>>> >
>>> > >         1) Almost every tertiary education institution has a
>>> > >         professional development unit -- yet in my experience most
>>> are
>>> > >         not adequately resourced in terms of staff or budget to do
>>> > >         what needs to be done on campus.
>>> > >         2) An OER approach to professional development should
>>> > >         theoretically be less threatening to institutions testing the
>>> > >         OER waters because PD courses for academic staff are not
>>> > >         necessarily courses on which institutions compete with each
>>> > >         other.
>>> >
>>> > >         Back in the early conceptualisation phases of WikiEducator
>>> > >         (i.e. before we moved to a hosted server solution) -- on 19
>>> > >         March 2006 I set up a PD development node on WE envisioning
>>> > >         rapid growth
>>> > >         (
>>> http://www.wikieducator.org/index.php?title=Professional_Development_...)
>>> -- However, I suspect that the idea was premature and poorly implemented
>>> :-), especially given that at the time we only had 10 registered accounts!
>>>  (Wow -- can you believe that we're nearing the threshold of 7000 users!)
>>> >
>>> > >         So I thinking the timing is right to progress this further.
>>> >
>>> > >         With reference to your suggested refinements on the L4C
>>> > >         initiative -- again the timing is just right from a strategic
>>> > >         point of view. The current iterration of L4C will run to 30
>>> > >         June 2009 -- as determined by our external funding support
>>> > >         from Hewlett. We need to start thinking about where we take
>>> > >         L4C in the future --- and I really like your ideas for
>>> > >         refocusing and reconfiguring the initiative.
>>> >
>>> > >         I'd be keen to hear what folk think?  How should WE provide
>>> > >         support for capacity development in the future?  In what ways
>>> > >         can we improve on our current approaches?
>>> >
>>> > >         Cheers
>>> > >         Wayne
>>> >
>>> > >         On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 09:10 -0800, Randy Fisher wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >         > Hi Everyone,
>>> >
>>> > >         > Great dialogue.....I've been sleeping on this thread here,
>>> > >         > reflecting on conversations that I've had with Nellie,
>>> Maria
>>> > >         > and several L4C students, and what's becoming clear, is
>>> that
>>> > >         > Professional Development is an essential 'branding
>>> > >         > opportunity' for WikiEducator. On WE, we have so many
>>> > >         > projects and activities, it's easy to get lost in the
>>> > >         > fog.... (so a bit of a ramble coming up here - I'm not as
>>> > >         > eloquent as Leigh or Wayne... :-)
>>> >
>>> > >         > I'm thinking back to my economic development days, and how
>>> > >         > can we 'package' what we have in a way that's appealing to
>>> > >         > educators - who may or may not know about open education.
>>> > >         > I'm also thinking about institutions' perennial quest to
>>> > >         > teach their teachers new stuff - which is great, but it's
>>> > >         > for the masses, not customised to the indivdual interests
>>> of
>>> > >         > teachers....
>>> >
>>> > >         > So, I'm thinking.... why not a process of "you scratch my
>>> > >         > back, I'll scratch someone else's itch". (Note, I didn't
>>> say
>>> > >         > "you scratch my back, I'll scratch 'yours').
>>> >
>>> > >         > The great thing about the WE community is that we have so
>>> > >         > many teacher-educators with so many interests (a
>>> > >         > network!)... The question is..., how can we leverage our WE
>>> > >         > Network in service of Teacher Educator's Professional
>>> > >         > Development? I'm thinking that it might make sense to go
>>> > >         > with a Centre of Excellence approach for Professional
>>> > >         > Development - to help us with branding and outreach to
>>> > >         > teacher educators in line with their own ProD interests,
>>> not
>>> > >         > just our wiki skills approach - (see what I've put up
>>> >
>>> > >         >http://www.wikieducator.org/Professional_Development
>>> >
>>> > >         > I'm also thinking that we have to change the L4C messaging
>>> > >         > around the requirements for the Learning Contract (i.e., in
>>> > >         > the 10-day or the 5-day courses) - put emphasis on what
>>> > >         > Learners have to Offer and Share with their Peers, in terms
>>> > >         > of something that they can Teach another Educator. (The
>>> > >         > emphasis on OER is great, but the reality is, that if you
>>> > >         > develop it on WikiEducator, it is an OER! :-)
>>> >
>>> > >         > I think a subtle yet important shift in emphasis could help
>>> > >         > us convey our value proposition, particularly those
>>> > >         > teacher-educators who want to learn new skills. Of course
>>> we
>>> > >         > want them to develop OERs in our community, but first
>>> things
>>> > >         > first - let's have them share something easy, something
>>> > >         > they're comfortable with, and something they can "teach"
>>> > >         > others in our community ....
>>> >
>>> > >         > Your thoughts, feedback?
>>> >
>>> > >         > - Randy
>>> >
>>> > >         > On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Leigh Blackall
>>> > >         > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >         >         And of course, anyone is free to participate in the
>>> > >         >         2 teacher training courses we have on Wikied
>>> already
>>> > >         >         (though they are
>>> >
>>> > ...
>>> >
>>> > read more »- Hide quoted text -
>>> >
>>> > - Show quoted text -
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> ________________
>> Randy Fisher - Change Management & Collaboration, Human Performance &
>> Engagement, Sustainable Communities & Organizations
>>
>> * Engaging People in Teams, Communities and Organizations....and
>> WikiEducator!
>>
>> + 1 604.684.2275
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> http://www.wikieducator.org
>> http://www.wikieducator.org/Community_Media
>> http://www.wikieducator.org/User:Randyfisher
>>
>> * Cool WikiEducator Video on YouTube:
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tc9-CNlIqsY
>>
>> * Can You Do the Wiki-Wiki? http://www.wikieducator.org/Wiki_Wiki
>>
>> Skype: wikirandy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Leigh Blackall
> +64(0)21736539
> skype - leigh_blackall
> SL - Leroy Goalpost
> http://learnonline.wordpress.com
> http://www.wikieducator.org/User:Leighblackall
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "WikiEducator" group.
To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
To post to this group, send email to wikieducator@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to