Several odious personages, actually. I scanned some of the comments, and they are all ethically challenged:
- - - comment from article - - - Comment by Melanie Phung <http://www.all-about-content.com/> - 2008-11-06 12:19:37 I’ll take that one step further. Start by spamming the crap out of the Wikipedia page in question with internal Wiki links — add links to as many Wikipedia pages as quickly as you can, they should be barely relevant. In my experience, adding a huge volume of internal links all at once can trip a Google filter and make the page disappear from the SERP (at least for a little while). Then in a day or so you can go back (obviously from a different IP/account) and remove all those links PLUS many of the original legit links in the name of cleaning up after “the spammer”. Just make sure you don’t look too obvious. This accomplishes two things: 1) you might succeed in knocking the page off Google’s front page for appearing to have gained a spammy link profile and 2) it gives you a legit looking reason to remove existing links on powerful Wiki pages. - - - end comment from article - - - Notice the stated aim is not to be ethical at all, the aim is to have a legit "looking" reason. The only concerns raised at all were either "But how do you prevent being caught?" and one very weak comment that "That's why this is blue hat, not white hat". Meh. David Gerard wrote: > http://www.bluehatseo.com/how-to-overthrow-a-wikipedia-result/ > > What an odious person. > > > - d. > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > > > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
