I disagree on the synopsis of *why* the wording used was used, but regardless I haven't yet seen any serious attempt to actually address the specific issue. And when I asked about volunteering to address the specific issue, I was essentially told the issue was more broad. That seems to be a kind-of skittering out from under the problem, not really an attempt to address it. I don't think addressing it requires a change to the wording. I'd like to see first, a serious attempt to address it on the specific article topic, and *only when that is found to be impossible* then resort to examining the policy language. Will Johnson
**************One site keeps you connected to all your email: AOL Mail, Gmail, and Yahoo Mail. Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000025) _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
