On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Wilhelm Schnotz <wilh...@nixeagle.org> wrote: > On 1/13/09, White Cat <wikipedia.kawaii.n...@gmail.com> wrote: >> AFDs cannot conclude as a "merge". AFDs are meant to be a binary decision. >> Something will either end up getting deleted or not. AFDs shouldn't go any >> further. > > But they do and theyn have for quite some time. Other results from an > AFD are cleanup, redirect, no consensus (default keep), keep, delete, > I think there are a few others. It *is* widely accepted practice and > has been for as long as I have been here.
<snip> "cleanup" is not an AfD result I've ever seen. It has been a long-standing axiom as far as I can remember that AfD is not cleanup. What *can* happen is someone closes as keep or no consensus, and then *adds* their opinion (or that of others) that cleanup is needed. But that is not a close of "cleanup". Carcharoth _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
