On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Ray Saintonge <sainto...@telus.net> wrote:
> Not everybody pays attention to GA/FA. A public rating system where > anyone can rate each article on a 0-10 scale might be controversial to > implement, but on a cumulative basis would give a good statistically > based valuation of the article. <snip> We have something similar at the moment, done by editors, not readers (a big difference): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Assessment That has about 6 or 7 levels, depending whether you include both GA and A-class. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Articles_by_quality Stats are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Index Estimates as to the reliability of the assessments vary, but the stats at the time of writing are: 1489 projects (WikiProjects) 1,960,650 articles tagged 1,607,658 articles assessed Total number of articles: 2,698,457 See also the talk page of that index for some more stats. Carcharoth _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
