Lets just be clear that this is an IMHO that has nothing to do with my point - the source of authority on the subject. All primary sources are biased in that respect.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:24 AM, <wjhon...@aol.com> wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian <brian.min...@colorado.edu> > To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org> > Sent: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:54 pm > Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] An open letter to Jimmy Wales > > In my opinion what Wikipedia says about this matter is entirely > irrelevant. > Wikipedia is not a source of authority on the matter - the Wikimedia > Foundation is.>> > ------------------------- > > Foundations like companies are mostly the worst possible historians. > They have a vested interest in rewriting history to match their current > goals. > > Will Johnson > > > > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l