Lets just be clear that this is an IMHO that has nothing to do with my point
- the source of authority on the subject. All primary sources are biased in
that respect.

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:24 AM, <wjhon...@aol.com> wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian <brian.min...@colorado.edu>
> To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
> Sent: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:54 pm
> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] An open letter to Jimmy Wales
>
> In my opinion what Wikipedia says about this matter is entirely
> irrelevant.
> Wikipedia is not a source of authority on the matter - the Wikimedia
> Foundation is.>>
> -------------------------
>
> Foundations like companies are mostly the worst possible historians.
> They have a vested interest in rewriting history to match their current
> goals.
>
> Will Johnson
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Reply via email to