wjhon...@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 4/23/2009 1:34:55 AM Pacific Daylight Time, > charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com writes: > > Sorry, you hold what qualification in medieval history to make this > comment? What do you think the so-called "feudal system" was > about if > not the holding of land, which made up most of the economy of Europe > from say 600 to at least 1600? >> > > -------------------- > > Not the point. > This article is not about the feudal system, not about an example of a > person with a hundred plots of land. It's about one person, their > life. Not their land holdings. > > By the way. I didn't "target a constructive editor". I did not look, > and don't make it a habit to look at *who* edited an article. It's a > waste of time. The article is the thing, not the people behind it. > > This article is poor. Whether it's a good example of the feudal > system or not (and it's not) isn't relevant to whether it's a good > example of a stubby biography (which it's not). > You cut the comment where you claimed the land holdings were insignificant: "his Domesday holdings which are completely insignificant historically,
They weren't. How is writing "This article is painful ... I can't believe someone did this" not targetting a good-faith editor adding verifiable, factual and relevant information to Wikipedia? You go back in my killfile. Charles _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
