Well, I don't mind that these things run without financial compensation. But it would be nice to receive credit. The Brandeis restoration especially was a difficult job that took about three days.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Steve Bennett <stevag...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Durova<nadezhda.dur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > And the government of Australia appears to be using the restoration of > > Douglas MacArthur uncredited. > > http://www.ww2australia.gov.au/waratsea/kamikaze.html > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Douglas_MacArthur_lands_Leyte1.jpg > > Yeah but now you're getting really subtle. Crediting a restoration is > a less obvious thing to do, and probably less serious if they don't. > Speaking for myself, I often disregard copyright notices when the > source material is clearly very old - I assume the copyright notices > have been plastered all over without thought. But maybe I'm missing > transformation processes... > > Btw, found an even better reuse of one of my images: > > http://article.wn.com/view/2007/11/30/A_man_says_he_was_robbed_of_700_during_a_cocaine_deal_before/ > > Kind of amusing. The text even refers to a "pickup" truck, not a cement > mixer... > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > -- http://durova.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l