2009/6/19 Emily Monroe <bluecalioc...@me.com>: >> At one extreme reviewing at [[wp:FAC]] is very interactive and in my >> experience usually very collegial. >> >> At the other extreme, when I'm feeling less sociable I find I can >> while away hours eradicating preforming from the entertainment >> industry or removing a surplus s to merge the Olympic sports of >> synchronised ventriloquism and discus throwing. >> >> Somewhere in between is newpage patrol, most new articles are >> written by newbies who haven't mastered categorisation and wiki >> format. If you install hotcat and try to categorise new articles >> you'll soon find yourself collaborating with lots of editors. > > True, true. It would makes sense that different parts of the > wikipedia need to have different levels of discussion. > > What about wikiprojects? Are they very "collaborative", or do they > serve only as assessment graders? >
Varies from project to project over time. Some are quite collaborative others more stick to highlighting weak points and standardisation. Articles on current events are commonly collaborative. -- geni _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l