> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:17 PM, stevertigo<stv...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Thomas Dalton >> <thomas.dal...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> 2009/6/27 stevertigo <stv...@gmail.com>: >>> >> >> >>> > Thomas, the distinctions you present -- that dispute resolution has >>> public >>> > and private dimensions, and that these different dimensions of >>> dispute >>> > resolution require different technological formats -- is unknown to >>> me. >>> Is >>> > there policy in which the necessity for these distinctions is >>> outlined? >>> >>> I never said it was necessary, I just said that's the way it is. >>> Unless you can describe a problem with a current system, I see no >>> reason to change it. >>> >> >> You could start a thread called "if it ain't broke don't fix it" and >> there >> we can debate whether the axiom applies to anything other than >> appliances. >> :-) > > I would actually suggest two lists, if we could do this - > > One, an announce-only list which summarized ongoing dispute resolution > (arbcom cases, RFCs, community discussions of note elsewhere) for > those who find following all the threads on-wiki daunting with real > life time constraints. > > Two, discussion. > > Perhaps one list, but a regular posting of the announcements, but I > think some people would be more interested in just announcements. I > would participate in both, but I think that giving some people the > option to just get the announcements is more respectful of their > bandwidth... > > > -- > -george william herbert > george.herb...@gmail.com >
I think this is a good refinement of the idea. Fred _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
