On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:55 AM, geni<geni...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/6/29 Gwern Branwen <gwe...@gmail.com>: >> “We were really helped by the fact that it hadn’t appeared in a place >> we would regard as a reliable source,” he said. “I would have had a >> really hard time with it if it had.”" >> ... > > The question is though is is > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pajhwok_Afghan_News genuinely not a > reliable source?
Even if we think *they* were not a RS (which of course they are), there were still other sources: "Word came close to leaking widely last month when Rohde won his second Pulitzer Prize, as part of the Times team effort for coverage of Afghanistan and Pakistan. The Italian news agency Adnkronos International did spill the beans, reportedly spurring a number of blogs into action." http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25673247-2703,00.html -- gwern _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
