On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 19:23, <wjhon...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>  The language chosen will hopefully be as ENGLISH-like as possible, even it 
> that means it requires more typing.? The hyper-complex and excessively 
> structured codes of most languages make it difficult for the vast majority of 
> our contributors to even try to make a break into them.
>
> In addition to that, English-like languages are easier for programmers in 
> other languages to pick up because they seem more sensible than learning a 
> whole new set of obscure codewords and symbols.? A language that uses "AND" 
> instead of "&", "+" or "[]".? A language that uses "NOT" instead of "-", "/" 
> or "_".

Every few years, English-derived programming languages become
fashionable as a solution for programming being difficult, and every
few years, another generation of advocates discovers that it isn't the
obscure codewords and symbols that make programming difficult.

-- 
Mark
[[User:Carnildo]]

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Reply via email to