Evidently there are some sins which didn't exist when Dante was writing.



<<(Which is why viXra is such thrilling news. It's like Hell wasn't deep
enough, so they're digging tenth and eleventh circles below the
basement.)>>



 


 


 

-----Original Message-----
From: David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com>
To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Fri, Jul 17, 2009 2:40 pm
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Ahhh, physics cranks










2009/7/17 Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com>:

> Not really. For the kind of things you get on arXiv "reliable" is
> usually taken to mean "peer-reviewed", so you would cite the journal
> the paper was published in. You might link to the arXiv version for
> convenience, but you would be citing the journal, not arXiv.


"For convenience" is a good way of putting it. Some arXiv-published
work is of minor note (e.g. Garrett Lisi's e8 Theory of Everything was
in the news after its release), but being in arXiv is not in itself
anything special whatsoever. It's all but self-published.

(Which is why viXra is such thrilling news. It's like Hell wasn't deep
enough, so they're digging tenth and eleventh circles below the
basement.)


- d.

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l



 

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Reply via email to