If by "light" you mean the wave portion, than I'd probably agree with you, that it's not "matter". However "light" is also a photon, which as a particle, I would have to say is "matter", massless or no. I seem to recall however this little thing called the particle-wave duality of nature. That is every particle is also a packet of energy with a wave-form and you could think of it as if they are constantly switching from a particle to a wave and back again. At any rate, when the total amount of matter in the universe is calculated, don't they include as well loose electrons and photons in that equation? As well as neutrinos for that matter. I'd still be interested in an authority you could cite that specifically states that other than energy and matter there is this third entity that is neither one, which you seem to be claiming. In a message dated 7/27/2009 7:20:06 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, stv...@gmail.com writes:
Well not all things are "matter." Light, for example. **************An Excellent Credit Score is 750. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221823322x1201398723/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd=Jul yExcfooterNO62) _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l