On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Carcharoth<carcharot...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Jussi-Ville > Heiskanen<cimonav...@gmail.com> wrote: > > <snip> > >> More seriously - relatively speaking - I think we actually >> do have quite a few emperors and the like favorite rides >> as articles of their own. Granted horse are not generally >> considered pets. > > Deletionists, look away now... > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Famous_animals
<sob> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Animal_births_by_year http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Animal_deaths_by_year That is ridiculous category use. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Animal_amputees http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Famous_lobsters And going full-circle: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:United_States_Presidential_pets Carcharoth _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
