stevertigo wrote: >> horse-trading and straw polls which are part of the proper work of a >> committee. In fact Arbitration cases generate acres of material showing >> how decisions are made; and in most cases (not all) what appears on the >> wiki is at least a fair record of how a decision was reached. >> > > Ah. "Horse trading" as in I will agree to ban Peter for one year, if > you agree to ban Paul or two? In the context of Arbitration, the > practice is actually quite a DBAD violation. > No, you misunderstand. When a case is clearly not going to get closed with the current set of findings, someone has to initiate a phase of discussion that ends with a better set of proposed findings, incorporating modifications that have broader support. Try AGF.
Charles _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
