Bod Notbod wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Phil > Nash<pn007a2...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > >>>> I guess it would also be feasible and helpful if BLPs were >>>> highlighted >>>> on the usual Watchlist interface too? (Turn on and off-able in >>>> preferences, perhaps?) >> >> That would not be feasible, because any edit to any article can have >> [[WP:BLP]] consequences; consider, for example, an addition to >> [[Watermelon]] that said "<name of schoolmate> of <smalltown, >> Kansas> is allergic to melons because they turn him into a >> pedophile"; > > Ha ha, I like the way you think :o) > > However, we do have [[Category:Living people]], so if we had those > highlighted on Watchlists and in editing tools, that would surely help > the cause, no? And it could be a choice in prefs or in the tool > whether you want that function? > > It can't catch all BLP problems as you've so wonderfully illustrated. > But it can show us a worthwhile subset, don't you reckon?
That would be one way forward; we now have abuse filters which detect and revert the more gross edits, but as far as I know, there is no feasible way of monitoring articles within a category wholesale, so we are no further forward. Certainly, major targets of BLP vandalism tend to be already well-known and they are usually caught quite quickly; beyond that, it depends on monitoring [[Special:RecentChanges]], which some editors already do; however, given the volume of incoming edits, some slip through that net too. There was a proposal what seems like a long time ago for "Flagged Revisions", which was somewhat controversial but was intended to be introduced as a test, at least for a while; that would have meant that BLP violations could have been filtered, but nothing seems to have happened practically- however, Cary Bass has recently proposed a working party on BLPs and I look forward to the outcome of that. Meanwhile, we are stuck with pure human (and some semi-automated), and therefore error-prone intervention. Not perfect, perhaps, but better than nothing. Cheers > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.44/2283 - Release Date: > 08/05/09 05:57:00 _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l