> Yes. Thanks for explaining what I was trying to say. You're welcome. :-)
I'd qualify as being neuroatypical. I've been on the receiving end of what I just did on several occasions throughout my lifetime. The best thank you would be to pass it on. Emily On Aug 11, 2009, at 8:33 PM, Carcharoth wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Emily Monroe<bluecalioc...@me.com> > wrote: >>> Because he is saying that basically what we are suggesting: a common >>> set of standards governing personal interaction cannot be found. >>> This is simply not true. And a concerted, serious effort to >>> accomplish this is what is needed; not "it's hopeless, because it's >>> too big". Nonsense! >> >> I didn't interpret what Carcharoth said to mean that that's it's >> hopeless. I think what he meant was "We have several core values that >> we refuse to compromise on, yet we recognize that they need to be >> applied on a case by case basis depending on the individual >> situation. >> The fact that we have so many people, who grew up and live around the >> world, and who have brains and political/religious/sexual beliefs >> that >> may or may not have brains that are considered the 'norm', makes this >> even more important." Is this true, Carcharoth? > > Yes. Thanks for explaining what I was trying to say. > > Carcharoth > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l