>> I think the same thing applies to our civility policy. If we want >> it to be respected, we have to start blocking people if they refer >> to another user as a "cunt", no matter what the provocation. > > Do this and you've suddenly made provocation a lot more profitable > for the provoker.
Like I said before, both the provoker and provokee need to be blocked. Prefrebly, the provoker would actually get a longer block, with less chances to "start over". We don't accept BAITing, after all. Emily On Aug 12, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Ken Arromdee wrote: > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Surreptitiousness wrote: >> I think the same thing applies to >> our civility policy. If we want it to be respected, we have to start >> blocking people if they refer to another user as a "cunt", no matter >> what the provocation. > > Do this and you've suddenly made provocation a lot more profitable > for the > provoker. > > There's a reason why zero tolerance policies are considered unjust > in real > life by just about everyone who's thought about them. > > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l