Steve Bennett wrote: > The 1% reversion rate for experienced editors was also interesting. I > doubt my edits get reverted at anything like that high a rate. > Yes, the mean here might tell less than the median. (I.e. you'd expect to see very different figures for controversial and non-controversial articles, and lumping all articles and frequent editors together and averaging isn't going to be that helpful.)
As http://asc-parc.blogspot.com/ admits, they (the PARC people) have basically done a press release on a conference paper that won't be produced until WikiSym in October. This would account for the rather sensationalised tone of it all. Charles _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
