Ok... substantive change? Discount changes that only shift text around, fix grammar, add cats and so on. Or maybe any article where the sole sources have been added by a single editor. Sounds a bit WP:OWNish doesn't it?
-----Original Message----- From: Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com> To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org> Sent: Tue, Aug 18, 2009 3:58 pm Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Request to Wikipedians for BBC Documentary 2009/8/18 <wjhon...@aol.com>: > Only if I can write a corollary, "Any article 90 days old or more, with > a single editor should be deleted". That would be a ground-level bar > on "notability". And also an interesting exercise in cobweb control. What about new page patrollers tagging and categorising? Do they count as editors? It takes less than 90 minutes for a new article to get its first edits from other people. You would need to work out where to draw the line, which is never easy. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
