On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Andrew Gray<andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk> wrote: > 2009/8/21 quiddity <pandiculat...@gmail.com>: > >> For example, we have these pages, that are variously explicating, >> disambiguation, and listing: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_(disambiguation) >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_water >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Water >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Water >> which in the main article, [[Water]], even manages to bring us back to >> the original topic, of yes, excessive or inappropriate hatnotes could >> be considered harmful! > > I see the "outlines of X" pages are spreading. Last I saw, they were > being added in "see also" sections - when did they leap to the > forefront of the article?
It was an experiment that was being tested a few months ago. No new hatnotes are being added for these (afaik), but the old ones haven't all been cleaned up yet. Quiddity _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
