I dispute that this is my private meaning. And I propose that this is the standard meaning. As well as the inworld meaning.
-----Original Message----- From: David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org> Sent: Wed, Sep 9, 2009 1:48 am Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Secondary sources 2009/9/9 <wjhon...@aol.com>: > What I said, and what I've been saying is that any source which is our > first incident of a particular "fact" is a primary source, no matter > what their source was. You must appreciate, though, that your private definition of this term is not the established meaning for this term, which has been in use since well before Wikipedia started. And that using private definitions of terms without acknowledging doing so only leads to confusion. - d. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
