In a message dated 9/13/2009 3:19:21 PM Pacific Daylight Time, ft2.w...@gmail.com writes:
> Papers are reviewed annually, or upon major new information, so they > become a living document -- the paper on the higgs boson as it is now, > and > the same paper as it was a year, 2 years ago, showing the advance of > knowledge and correcting itself as time passes and knowledge develops.>> > > I would say that by this we'd have to mean that a paper cannot change. In that way it has to behave like a print version. Once it's set, than it can't change, otherwise the voting and review process would no longer match the current state of the paper. Rather, like print, if a new paper is submitted, even by the same author on the same topic, it has to be a new entry in "this month's" journal, not a modification of a now-historical version. Will _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
