On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Carcharoth <carcharot...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> Is that "date taken" or "date published"? This is why provenance of > photographs (both photographer and publication details, and dates) is > important. You should also make clear *who* is saying that this > photograph was taken in 1903. Sometimes publication and photographed > dates are mixed up. Also, the location where something is published > can be important. If the photographer is known, it's 'taken before 1 Jan 1955'. If the photographer is not known or they are anonymous or pseudonymous, it's 'taken or published before 1 Jan 1955'. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
