George Herbert wrote: > "Verifyable, but untrue" - where there's evidence to disprove but it's > not compellingly better quality data than the untrue data - is the > hard case. Either walk the narrow line and present both or pick one > and defend using it, staying aware that more info may clarify the > situation into the first case above. > > The advantage of raising doubts by presenting both is that some yet unknown person with access to better sources may become aware of the uncertainty. Honestly admitting uncertainties improves reliability.
Ec _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
