On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 18:55, Nathan <nawr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Perhaps there are folks who are scraping just > the On this day section, or people who look there for interesting > tidbits on the date. Or expect to look there to find articles on the > day's events in history.
True. OTD's contents won't change substantially from year to year, so perhaps the wise and attractive admins who manage the Main Page could let OTD do its own thing. The OTD box could also potentially be restructured a bit to draw more attention to the main article for whichever day. (There are quite > a few articles and images related to Pearl Harbor, where any mention > of them would include a reference to Pearl Harbor... Does that mean > featuring any of them on Dec 7 excludes the event itself from OTD?). > Who says we can only feature Pearl Harbor-related articles or images on December 7? The daily FA and FP should reflect our best works, whether or not they're related to some significant anniversary. If that means that the article on the USS Arizona is featured on the Main Page in February, then that's fine by me. -- Jim Redmond [[User:Jredmond]] _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
