We all know William Connolley is an advocate for taking climate change seriously. However there remains a lack of reliable information which negates his position. If there was such information, those of us who follow this issue would have settled his beeswax fast enough.
Fred > Ken Arromdee wrote: >> Now has a Slashdot story: >> >> http://slashdot.org/submission/1137140/Climategate-spreads-to-Wikipedia >> >> Which links to two articles: >> http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=62e1c98e-01ed-4c55-bf3d-5078af9cb409 >> http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpcomment/archive/2008/05/03/who-is-william-connolley-solomon.aspx >> >> At a minimum this sounds like conflict of interest, and worse if any of >> these >> accusations are true (although the article counts are probably >> misreporting, >> and I bet they include all articles he deleted and all banned users >> regardless >> of associations with climate change). >> >> > Erm, you wouldn't be jumping to any conclusions here? And > misinterpreting what we mean by "conflict of interest"? Which does not > equate to academic involvement in a topic (no longer William's > situation, by the way?) Or neglecting quite a substantial history of > dispute resolution down the years, which at minimum involves people who > actually understand policy looking at actual edits? > > Charles > > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
