On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:29 PM, quiddity <pandiculat...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Ken Arromdee <arrom...@rahul.net> wrote: > ... >> elsewhere. Our rules generally don't say we can't use information unless >> it has *two* sources; and in this case it's obvious that the reason the >> information is hard to find is that Neil Gaiman is trying to keep it quiet, >> not that it isn't true. >> > > Unless there's a [[Template:Notable_Wikipedian]] tag missing from the > article's talkpage, > I suspect you probably mean "Neil Gaiman's /fans are/ trying to keep > it quiet". Not neilhimself...! > > quiddity.
No, I think he meant Neil. Did you know there's not one single use of the term 'Scientology' on neilgaiman.com or any subdomains? Given his family is Scientologist, he was raised a Scientologist in a major bastion of Scientology, married a Scientologist, and so on, and given that people have been interested in all the foregoing for a long time, and also given that he used to have comments on the website, and *also* given that he is historically very responsive to random questions about just about anything* - the utter silence must be deliberate. Which is as one would expect. * I know this from personal experience: http://journal.neilgaiman.com/2004/09/from-mailbag-er-i-won-huck.asp -- gwern _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l